On June 1 NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen declared that the Alliance had authorized continuation of the war for three more months, until the end of September, and a week later he confirmed that the defense chiefs of NATO's 28 member states, including the Pentagon's Robert Gates, endorsed the decision to extend so-called Operation Unified Protector for another 90 days during a defense ministerial meeting at NATO Headquarters in Belgium.
In addition to the deployment of British Apache and French Gazelle and Tiger attack helicopters - the first equipped with what the Daily Mirror described as "a deadly missile dubbed 'the mincer'" a "gruesome anti-personnel missile containing 80 5in-long steel darts called flechettes," the U.S. has dispatched the mammoth USS George H.W. Bush nuclear supercarrier with an accompanying strike group to the Mediterranean Sea for what portends a military endgame for the North African state of slightly over six million people.
The above-cited British newspaper recently referred to the George H.W. Bush, now on its maiden deployment and at the time engaged in war games, Exercise Saxon Warrior, with the Royal Navy's HMS Dauntless and HMS Gloucester, as the "world's most powerful warship," adding that "The 97,000-ton Bush carries in excess of 70 aircraft from eight squadrons and 5,300 sailors and aircrew." More Here.
Noticed what's going on with warships outside of Russia, et al.?
ReplyDeleteJust saw it somewhere. And your post made me think twice about it.
Thanks for all you do to keep us informed.
Haven't seen the Russian story, Suzanne. I will follow it up.
ReplyDeleteBest
T
I support NATO's mission in Libya in principle, but the operation is running far below its maximum potential for reasons beyond hesitant NATO states. Libya's revolutionaries need more time than Western officials have been willing to grant, due to public opposition. The same problems plague every U.S. operation - starting with a lack of clarity and transparency at the top of the command chain.
ReplyDeleteMismanaged perceptions are a grave strategic error in any insurgency, which Libya's revolution qualifies as.
I supported NATO in Bosnia, James but obviously it is a different game in Libya. I don't want Ghaddafi to survive but what is the eventual alternative? NATO don't know and neither do the insurgents as you rightly describe them. I have speculated before, although I know you disagree, that Islamists will fill the vacuum. I can't forgive NATO for the debacle in Afghanistan either. They don't really know what they are doing beyond the next 48 hours at any given time.
ReplyDelete